4th Grenadier Guards (Tank Bn) War Diary

Discussion in 'The Brigade of Guards' started by Bernie, Jun 9, 2014.

  1. Bernie

    Bernie Junior Member

    Hello

    WO 171/1255 has the war diary up to December 1944, but what happened after then?
    Does anyone know if there is a further diary - nothing else shows up in a search on the TNA website.

    Thanks
    Bernie
     
  2. dbf

    dbf Moderatrix MOD

    Perhaps your search terms were too narrow and you included "tank". After the end of hostilities that bn designation would have no longer been applicable.

    4th Battalion Grenadier Guards
    WO 166/4101 4 Grenadier Guards 1940 Oct.- 1941 Dec.
    WO 166/8572 4 Grenadier Guards 1942 Jan.- Dec.
    WO 166/12466 4 Grenadier Guards 1943 Jan.-Dec.
    WO 171/1255 4 Grenadier Guards (Tank Battalion) 1944 Jan.- Dec.
    WO 171/5146 4 Grenadier Guards 1945 Jan.- Dec.
    WO 267/421 4 Bn. Grenadier Guards 1946 July-Sept.
     
  3. Drew5233

    Drew5233 #FuturePilot 1940 Obsessive

    Hi Bernie - I've had a look through my records and I've never copied any 4 GG war diaries. Give me a shout if you want any copying.

    Cheers
    Andy
     
  4. Bernie

    Bernie Junior Member

    Thanks to dbf for the info.

    Andy, I'll ask my uncle (who served in the 4th Bn) to see if he's still interested. He told me he watched the D-Day commemorations on TV then dreamed about it all night.

    Bernie
     
    Richard Jacques likes this.
  5. Drew5233

    Drew5233 #FuturePilot 1940 Obsessive

    No probs - Just drop me a PM if you need anything.

    Cheers
    Andy
     
  6. Owen

    Owen -- --- -.. MOD

  7. Tolbooth

    Tolbooth Patron Patron

    Bit of a long shot but thought I'd bump this thread in the hope someone might have this units WD, specifically 30th July 44, opening day of OPERATION BLUECOAT.

    Thanks in anticipation
     
    Richard Jacques and Bernie like this.
  8. Bernie

    Bernie Junior Member

    Hello, I came across your post by accident, here are pages covering 30th July 1944.

    The tank from No2 Squadron mentioned in the last entry for the 30th was my Uncles' tank. As the diary says, three of the crew were killed, my Uncle and another crew member got out alive. He said the shell went through them like a hot knife through butter, and must have lodged in the engine compartment.





    Screenshot 2019-01-26 at 12.44.38.png Screenshot 2019-01-26 at 12.45.35.png Screenshot 2019-01-26 at 12.46.06.png Screenshot 2019-01-26 at 12.48.24.png Screenshot 2019-01-26 at 12.49.21.png Screenshot 2019-01-26 at 12.53.05.png
     
    Richard Jacques and dbf like this.
  9. Bernie

    Bernie Junior Member

  10. Tolbooth

    Tolbooth Patron Patron

    Bernie, many thanks for that.

    I'm trying to piece together as much as I can about the action around Sept Vents - a very small, unremarked, and unremarkable, part of a very large battle, but interesting to me as the first action for one, probably very nervous, Lothians' Trooper FW Bagley - my Father !
     
    Richard Jacques and dbf like this.
  11. harkness

    harkness Well-Known Member

    Ref Map:
    Sept_Vents_ref_map.jpg

    1947:
    Sept_Vents_1947.jpg

    1972:
    Sept_Vents_1972.jpg

    2012:
    Sept_Vents_2012.jpg
     
    dbf and Tolbooth like this.
  12. Tolbooth

    Tolbooth Patron Patron

    Thanks Harkness - the '47 photo is useful.
     
  13. harkness

    harkness Well-Known Member

    Sept_Vents_01.jpg

    Sept_Vents_03.jpg

    Sept_Vents_04.jpg
     
    Tolbooth likes this.
  14. harkness

    harkness Well-Known Member

    9 Aug 1947:
    Sept_Vents.jpg
     
  15. dbf

    dbf Moderatrix MOD

    From 6th Guards Tank Brigade, Forbes, pages 18-19:

    The morning of the 30th dawned fine but misty. Smoke from the artillery barrage engulfed the valley, making visibility virtually nil. At about 8 o'clock the first tanks rumbled slowly over the skyline and drove into the valley below. The GRENADIERS were split up, two Squadrons making for SEPT VENTS, and the other No. 3, for LUTAIN WOOD. The attack on SEPT VENTS went well and by 8.30 the village had been taken. Five tanks went up on mines but not a single anti-tank gun put in an appearance. The infantry suffered some casualties but a number of prisoners were captured. The attack on LUTAIN WOOD also succeeded, but it began tragically when Captain George GREY, M.P., for some time the youngest member of the House of Commons, was killed by a sniper. Shortly afterwards Lieutenant MARSHALL-CORNWALL was also killed by a sniper as he was waving a group of prisoners back behind the lines. The Squadron Leader, Major CROSTHWAITE, had nine flamethrowers and eight Sherman Flails under his command; the latter were never used but the flame-throwers successfully burnt the edge of LUTAIN WOOD to the great discomfort of the Germans inside. After Lieutenant MARSHALL-CORNWALL was killed, Lance Sergeant KINGTON, in the remaining tank of the troop, spent four hours behind German lines doing untold destruction and at eight yards' range liquidated a party of German prisoners who were disposed to throw grenades. By 8.30 SEPT VENTS and LUTAIN WOOD had been captured, and the rest of the Brigade had a proper jumping off point for their attack.

    There could be no doubt of the success of this first action. A dejected line of shaken German prisoners began staggering in. Told by their commanders that they were only faced by one battle-weary American Division, the sight of the 50 Churchills supporting the already feared 15th SCOTTISH DIVISION convinced them of the folly of further resistance. Poles, Russians, even two reputed Japanese, were amongst the prisoners. Quivering with fear, they were only too willing to talk; their bad morale was obvious and it had not been encouraged by their officers who had run away at the start.

    The COLDSTREAM, following just behind the GRENADIERS at SEPT VENTS, were being delayed by the close country and enemy positions concealed in farms and behind high banks. The Infantry were finding it impossible to keep up with the tanks owing to mortar fire and sniping. By half-past nine the creeping barrage, which was to advance at the rate of a hundred yards every four minutes, was due to begin, and all the benefit derived from it would be lost if the Battalion did not push on. So the Brigadier ordered the COLDSTREAM to advance through the Bocage to their goal at HERVIEUX without the Infantry.

    The SCOTS GUARDS on the left had been encountering much the same difficulties as the COLDSTREAM; the terrible country and the strength of the enemy positions around LUTAIN WOOD making fast progress impossible, especially for the Infantry. So at half-past nine they were also ordered by the Brigadier to push forwards to benefit by the artillery barrage, and so both Battalions advanced without their Infantry.

    IMG_0151.JPG
     
    Tolbooth likes this.
  16. Tolbooth

    Tolbooth Patron Patron

    Interesting that the author says Sept Vents was taken by 8:30 but 4th GREN GDS war diary says "Resistance in Sept Vents was fairly strong and it was not finally subdued until 1300". The supporting 9th CAMERONIANS were still meeting enemy opposition at 0900 and didn't report the village clear until 1230. The LOTHIANS were still reporting spasmodic MG fire from the NW of Sept Vents at 1330.

    My father's flail troop, commanded by Lt P B Carter, was ordered up to clear the road into the village about 0930;

    "Lt P B Carter was given orders to clear the road of mines and brought up three tanks. He himself in the leading tank exploded eight mines in approx 35yds, before being blown up, damaging the nearside assembly. He wirelessed to Sgt Rawlinson to bring up his tank and flail the crown of the road. Sgt Rawlinson flailed two mines before he himself was blown up by three mines which were exploded simultaneously by one detonator. The dvr of the tank, LCpl Buck, W C B, received the full impact of one mine underneath the floor boards and damaged his right foot; he was evacuated.
    The road by this time had become blocked by damaged vehs and Lt P B Carter decided to make a lane on the South side of the road and running parallel to it. He ordered Sgt Mackie to do this and make a lane up to the church, and return by the same route, thus making a 16ft lane. Sgt Mackie did this without interference and the Churchills and inf went through to capture the village."

    I believe this photo shows the flails of the Lothians recovering, whilst the infantry and carriers of 15th (Scottish) Div move forward some time during the afternoon of 30 Jul.

    Universal carriers, infantry and Sherman tanks move forward 30 July 1944.jpg
    Copyright IWM


    And my apologies, we seem to have drifted off the threads' topic
     
  17. dbf

    dbf Moderatrix MOD

    Normally I'd say 'Go by what the WD source says' - not a published compilation which is what Forbes' book is - but going by the consistency of the handwriting alone that WD looks suspiciously neat/copied out. Wonder if we can dig up some other sources?

    It adds to the bigger picture John, although if you now want a separate thread, specific to Bluecoat/Sept Vents, I'm sure we could move posts to the NWE sub and leave a link ...?
     
  18. Tolbooth

    Tolbooth Patron Patron

    Perhaps we should let the BAOR Battlefield Tour Notes, and in particular Brigadier, R.M. VILLIERS, DSO, CO 9 Cameronians, have the last word;

    "The outline plan for the battalion was briefly this:-
    Our Start Line was the main road West of CAUMONT about VILLLENEUVE and we attacked almost due South with two companies forward.
    On the Right, C Company led with an objective about 500 - 600 yards South of SEPT VENTS. It was told to by-pass any opposition which delayed it.
    Of the two reserve companies, B Company on the Right had the task of mopping up behind C Company, and in particular the village of SEPT VENTS."

    "When C Company got going, it went fast and well.
    It developed into a platoon commander's battle, supported sometimes by a troop of tanks, sometimes by a single tank. There was considerable opposition in the village, but C Company by-passed this and reached its objective, where it surprised a battery of mortars actually in action. Behind C Company, B Company took a long time to mop up the village. Originally it had no tanks allotted to it and I think this was a mistake. It could well have used a troop or two of tanks and a troop of CROCODILES. Although C Company was on its objective by about 0900 hours it was mid-day before B Company reported the village clear. Having done so, the CSM found 20 Germans in the same orchards as Company HQ! That sort of thing happens in this thick 'bocage'."

    I'm finding it really enjoyable trying to piece together these small-scale actions that my father was a part of - and, of course, this place and the knowledgable people on it help tremendously!
     
    dbf likes this.
  19. m kenny

    m kenny Senior Member

    Two air views of Sept Vents taken 17 days apart.

    US7-1769    7034 June 7 1944.jpg

    4143  Sept Vents,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.jpg
     
    dbf and Tolbooth like this.
  20. Richard Jacques

    Richard Jacques New Member

    Hi Bernie,
    I have just come across your post by accident. By amazing coincidence, the tank from No 2 Squadron, 4th Tank Battalion, Grenadier Guards that was destroyed by a German 88mm anti-tank gun on 30th July 1944 on the first day of Operation Bluecoat was my father's tank. He was the other crew member who got out alive. Those killed included my father's best friend Gdsm. Maurice Henry "Butch" Bowler, Gdsm. Albert Robertshaw and L/Cpl. Francis Raymond Thorne. They are all buried at Banneville-la-Campagne War Cemetery.
    My father died in 1981, but he would have been 100 last week, which is what has prompted me to do some more research.
    I have never been able to establish who the fifth crew member was, or what happened to them.
    It would be good to hear from you.
     
    Chris C and Tolbooth like this.

Share This Page