Operation Market Garden-What really went wrong?

Discussion in 'NW Europe' started by Drew5233, Nov 22, 2008.

  1. 51highland

    51highland Very Senior Member

    It was meant as a bit of light hearted relief.
     
  2. Franek

    Franek WW2 Veteran WW2 Veteran

     
  3. Tom Canning

    Tom Canning WW2 Veteran WW2 Veteran

    Franek -
    I am surprised at your thoughts on this as a veteran you should know that when you are running short of manpower - you take risks to end the problem - and it was a big risk and too many good men died trying to end it - not a grandstand play by Montgomery but a calculated risk - approved by the Supreme Commander - to end a war which was draining the British manpower situation as it did in the first war.

    One thing about Monty that you should be aware of - he always went for metal before men were sacrificed on the basis that you can make a shell and a bomb in 15 minutes but it takes 20 years to make a man.

    All of his battles reflect that lesson learned in the first war and earned him untold insults as being slow - wanting more supplies than necessary - had to have superior materiel before making a move - generally by people who didn't quite understand his methods - people I suppose like yourself.
    Cheers
     
  4. Franek

    Franek WW2 Veteran WW2 Veteran

    I am in agreement with Owen. This Operation was a disaster waiting to happen from the beginning.. It was a grandstand play by Montgomery. A lot of brave people died because of him. His intent was to outdo Patton. He too was a Grand stander.. A lot of Americans died unnecessarily because of him.
     
    Tom Canning likes this.
  5. Owen

    Owen -- --- -.. MOD

    O look the thread is going exactly the same way as all the others.
    Told yer!
     
  6. Tom Canning

    Tom Canning WW2 Veteran WW2 Veteran

    Owen-
    I shall have to agree with you on this as inasmuch as I was not involved in the planning nor the execution of this operation as Franek obviously was since he knows of Montgomery's intent - I shall retire from this thread.
    Cheers
     
    von Poop likes this.
  7. Franek

    Franek WW2 Veteran WW2 Veteran

    Awww! Come on Tom. We should be able to disagree with each other. I also mentioned that Patton was a fool in my estimation. They both were glory seekers. If you were satisfied with Montgomery.
    Then that is your right. I am merely expressing my opinion.
    There was war at the top of ETO command between the high brass. Eisenhower and Montgomery had differences.
    Not to add fuel to the fire, I will leave it at that.
     
    Slipdigit likes this.
  8. Gerard

    Gerard Seelow/Prora

    What I love about Market Garden threads is if a person who knew nothing about History read them he would conclude:

    1. There was a race between the Americans and British to get to Berlin

    2. It was everyone's fault

    3. Although they were fighting the Germans, this was of no consequence because of 2 above

    4. The British drink a lot of tea

    5. The Americans have a General called Patton who, even if he never set foot near Arnhem, was absolutely crucial to the failure of the operation

    6. General Montgomery liked himself A LOT.
     
    Owen likes this.
  9. dbf

    dbf Moderatrix MOD

    Hi Drew,
    I saw the programme, in fact have seen it a few times. Will send you a PM.
    d
     
  10. Owen

    Owen -- --- -.. MOD

    As if the 'Yank v Brit' thing doesn't kick off enough on OMG threads, imagine the stink if it had been a US Airborne Div at Arnhem.

    Oh dear I've just done a 'what if..' & I hate what ifs...
     
  11. Gerard

    Gerard Seelow/Prora

    What I find truly amazing is that there's so much blame thrown at each other the fact that they faced a determined enemy is almost forgotten. As far as each is concerned it was the other Ally that stopped Market Garden, not the Enemy!!!

    Oh dear, Owen is off to "What if" land.......... this is not good. :(
     
  12. plant-pilot

    plant-pilot Senior Member

    What if..... there were no 'what if' threads? :p
     
  13. von Poop

    von Poop Adaministrator Admin

    What if..... there were no 'what if' threads? :p
    You may have noticed... we do seem to to quite well at avoiding 'em on the whole :D.

    There has to be an element of the subjective in 'discussion' of historical events, or it'd be no fun at all. But it does become part of the problem with the old 'Why did MG fail' question (and other famously 'controversial' subjects).
    If every opinion can be sensibly supported and justified we might be onto a winner. However Such close run things as MG seem to forever inspire more discussion of the possibilities and the apportionment of blame at the expense of the actualities, so they almost inevitably become purely subjective statements of opinion... which begins to run into the 'rocket powered flying tanks' territory.

    And that's never usually much of a worthwhile place to be... is it?
    (Rhetorical question alert! If anyone does think Iceland was crucial to an Axis victory, or that UFOs & antigravity devices could have saved the nazi's day. Please keep it to yourselves chaps... :unsure: :D )
     
  14. Gerard

    Gerard Seelow/Prora

    Well Iceland is situated at a fairly strategic location in the North Atlantic so from an Italian perspective they might have done better invading there than trying to hold Libya for example. Is this what you mean?? :D
     
  15. von Poop

    von Poop Adaministrator Admin

    The thought occurs...
    Might be a good role for the Social Groups as a space for this kind of thing, whether topics with inevitable 'heat', ad nauseum repetition of unfinishable arguments, or pure subjectivity.

    Anyone can set one up, they can be closed or open to non-members of that group to view, & the originator of the group can moderate who joins, or leave it completely open access.
    Social_Groups.
     
  16. Franek

    Franek WW2 Veteran WW2 Veteran

  17. Gerard

    Gerard Seelow/Prora

    PSSST OWEN.

    Close Combat: WWII History: Operation Market Garden
    In the middle between Arnhem and Eindhoven was the vital bridge at Nijmegen, this was left up to the American 82nd Airborne Division
    I think Owen was referring to an American Airborne Division landing in Arnhem, Franek. No doubt Owen is aware that the US forces landed two Divisions to take various targets to pave the way for XXX Corps.
     
  18. Smudger Jnr

    Smudger Jnr Our Man in Berlin

    I certainly bow to the superior knowledge of actual combatants and veterans such as Franek and Tom Canning and far be it from me to get involved in the likes or dislikes of generals in WW2.

    Please correct me if I am wrong, but I seem to recollect reading that Eisenhower admitted after the war that one of his biggest mistakes was not letting Montgomery loose in North Germany, due to his predjudices against him.

    Regards

    Tom
     
  19. Franek

    Franek WW2 Veteran WW2 Veteran

    OOOPS! My oversight. Sorry
     
  20. Franek

    Franek WW2 Veteran WW2 Veteran

     

Share This Page