Interesting thought. But does it not beg several questions? How did Churchill remain PM till the guns fell silent in Europe if for two plus years is orders ravaged the British military? How is it he is still revered as perhaps Britain's geatest Prime Minister in the last century or longer? How could American Officers and political leaders come to know that all of Britains battle failures were due to the PM and not to commanders actually directing troops as it would be in an American Army in battle? Or is it only seen in American armed forces as you seem to imply? Tom O'brian, merdiolu, fine posts!