Dismiss Notice

You must be 18 or over to participate here.
Dismiss this notice to declare that you are 18+.

Anyone below 18 years of age choosing to dishonestly dismiss this message is accepting the consequences of their own actions.
WW2Talk.Com will not approve of, or be held responsible, for your choices.

Handwritten Codes on Casualty List Records - Solved

Discussion in 'Searching for Someone & Military Genealogy' started by 7mark, Nov 17, 2016.

  1. Tony56

    Tony56 Member Patron

  2. dbf

    dbf Member

    Threads now merged.


    I'm wondering if the handwritten numbers refer to lists published in The Times, etc. See attachment in first post.
    These public lists were also numbered but I don't know if they were given the same reference as the WO lists. I can't access Times archives now to check.


    Years ago I read the file WO 162/199
    and I vaguely recall some instruction about breaking up, for example, a battalion's casualty list for one action into smaller groups. This was a kind of censorship and it might explain why different but almost consecutive numbers were written onto typed lists. From memory again, I think the lists in newspapers only denoted Regiment / Corps.

    (Sorry that my memory isn't as good as Owen's. But mine's been getting worse over the years - so I could be completely wrong.)


    If someone can find a list published in The Times or some other newspaper which quotes a number, they might then be able to find the corresponding (master) WO 417 Casualty list for the individuals - and then check the annotation.

    Can anybody confirm or dismiss this theory?
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2023
    8RB, papiermache and Tony56 like this.
  3. Tony56

    Tony56 Member Patron

    Excellent Diane, perhaps we have the answer?

    4105240 Fus M R Lloyd is mentioned in Casualty List No. 322 dated 1 Oct 1940:-
    Lloyd 1.jpg

    This appeared in a newspaper, confirming the existence of a second list:-

    Lloyd 2.jpg

    The newspaper was dated 3 Feb 41, sometime after the original list.
     
    4jonboy, 8RB, timuk and 3 others like this.
  4. Tony56

    Tony56 Member Patron

    Another:

    Casualty List No 218 dated 30 May 40:
    Colgan 1.jpg

    Newspaper dated 9 July 40:
    Colgan 2.jpg

    Note this refers to a list of 'officers and other ranks' whereas the official casualty list has separate lists for officers and O/Rs.
     
    8RB, timuk, BFBSM and 1 other person like this.
  5. dbf

    dbf Member

    Brilliant Tony, you're a star! Thanks very much for checking, and so quickly too,

    Looks likely, doesn't it, esp with 2 examples now!

    Before posting I was trying to remember the early days of my IG casualty research - without reference to WO 417. I recalled wondering why casualties, who I knew were from the same day/action, appeared on different dates/lists in same publication, often many weeks after the fact.


    So ... the handwritten notes correspond to separate lists prepared for publication which would combine Officer and OR lists. And the master lists were probably broken up, with any 'sub-unit designations' removed, for censorship purposes.
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2023
  6. Tony56

    Tony56 Member Patron

    An example from 1944.

    Casualty list No 1512 dated 31 July 44
    Kime 1.jpg
    Newspaper dated 10 Oct 44
    Kime 2.jpg

    Seems obvious now - why did it take us so long!!!!
     
  7. dbf

    dbf Member


    We like mysteries and suspenseful reveals !

    Ok then Tony, with that last example, I feel confident enough to edit the thread title
     
  8. dbf

    dbf Member

    Last edited: Apr 17, 2023
  9. GeoffMNZ

    GeoffMNZ Patron Patron

    well done
     
  10. Richard Lewis

    Richard Lewis Member

    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 5, 2023
    Redd, timuk, 4jonboy and 2 others like this.
  11. dbf

    dbf Member

    hah!
    This is as far as it goes for me.
    draft recognition codes | WW2Talk
    If anyone cares to compile a list...;)
     
  12. Tony56

    Tony56 Member Patron

    This is my reckoning.
    If you look at this post regarding the introduction of casualty lists you will note that "No casualty will be published until the next of kin has been informed."
    Casualty List No. 1

    In the past I have wondered how it was that soldiers were mentioned in casualty lists published within days of the incident, and how messages could have gone backwards and forwards and the NOK notified in such a short space of time.

    It is my belief therefore that the casualty lists themselves (separate for officers and ORs) were compiled as soon as the information was made available, but for 'internal' military purposes only. Procedures were then put in place to trace and notify the next of kin and only after this had been completed were the names put on a second, combined list, and this was the one that was made public and sent to the press.

    The reference number of this second list was then cross referenced back to the original to provide an audit trail.

    Only taken 7 years to work that out, by which time the war was over!!
     
  13. timuk

    timuk Well-Known Member

    I'm sure you're right. See dbf's #3 in General procedure for dealing with Casualties in War, 1939

    Officer's NOK to be notified by Casualty Branch.
    OR's NOK to be notified by the Regiment's/Unit's Officer i/c Records.

    (vi ) Officers i/c records will render daily a Record Office Casualty Return on Army Form W. 3016 to the War Office Casualty Section, detailing particulars of casualties dealt with during the day, the place and nature of the casualty, the nam and address of the next-of-kin and the date notified, etc. On days when no casualties are dealt with by officers i/c records, nil returns need not be sent to the War Office.

    (Note:- The War Office Casualty Section will not issue to the press particulars of casualties until information is received from officers i/c records that the next-of-kin have been notified.).

    Tim
     
  14. S H

    S H New Member

    Did you ever find out what this meant?
     
  15. timuk

    timuk Well-Known Member

    garethmk1, Redd, 4jonboy and 4 others like this.

Share This Page