Reports are different from research papers. And I am not dismissing the research papers as I am sure that the actual facts contained within them are accurate or as accurate as can be. But two research papers on the same subject with the same factual content can produce two very different conclusions. This means that if you are going to quote them as evidence to back your views, they should be substantiated by other material. To forward them as "US Army Reports" when they are not is deceptive and wrong. I am not "telling me that all reports are wrong that have been posted by the us army or just those that prove you so dead wrong?" Because what you have forwarded as US Army reports, aren't. Why else would they have "The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Department of Defense or any element thereof" written on the forward page? Or didn't you bother to read them? I also thank you on your observations:- "And no you could not enter a report because if you are to lazy to read them then you would be way to lazy to write one". I'd hate to assume anything about you, so I won't say I've written more reports than you (and I don't mean for school) but I would say that if you had written any professional reports I'd hope you'd have made a much more adult job of them than you have with your posts on here. You still know nothing about me so your childish and abusive comments are as everything else you post, just your opinion.