Tanks in WW2

Discussion in 'Weapons, Technology & Equipment' started by Peter Clare, Sep 3, 2008.

  1. Peter Clare

    Peter Clare Very Senior Member

    Not seen this before, I expect the experts have though.

    Tanks
     
  2. patrick1974

    patrick1974 We will remember them.

    Thanks a lot Peter for this link i didn't knew this site looks good.
     
  3. Tavarish_Alexei34

    Tavarish_Alexei34 Panzer_fan

    Very good site, but most pictures of "Tiger E" is actually Tiger H1
    Hypocrites.
     
  4. von Poop

    von Poop Adaministrator Admin

    Intrigued to hear what you might think the difference is?
    Never having seen the distinction applied in that way, I had a shufti & the use of H1/E appears to spring from computer games.
    The closest I can imagine was the VK4501 having that 'H' for Henschel applied during prototyping to make it distinct from the Porsche effort (and the speculative H2). Once it had 'won', the E came in purely as a designation. Details slightly altered over time, as with anything else, but not really distinct types.
     
  5. Tavarish_Alexei34

    Tavarish_Alexei34 Panzer_fan

    The Tiger H differed to the E by using rubber-rimmed road wheels and a larger Commanders cupola which made it very easy for them to be knocked out if hit in the cupola. So the Late version the "E" used a shorter cupola and had steel-pressed road wheels. Got that from a book by pen and sword the "Tiger" where it talks about all the different types of tanks based on the Tiger.
     
  6. Listy

    Listy Well-Known Member

    Universal Carrier

    Ummm, that's not a universal Carrier. Those are both Bren gun carriers.
     
    Chris C likes this.
  7. von Poop

    von Poop Adaministrator Admin

    All in-service Tiger 1s were 'Es' (in fact, pedantically; from a certain point in '44 they were just 'Tiger' at Adolf's insistence.) There's no distinction in nomenclature associated with production variations.
    H was a prototyping distinction, not an Ausf./model.

    I got that from years of trying to understand Tiger's history, but I'm over it now. (Who's the book by? There's a few P&S Tigger tomes.)
     
  8. Tavarish_Alexei34

    Tavarish_Alexei34 Panzer_fan

    It is by Anthony Tucker Jones, got it £3 in a sale when it was £15 from theworks.com
    I get your point about the Tiger. Just thought to point out the differences from what I knew. I am still learning though.
     
    Owen likes this.
  9. Owen

    Owen -- --- -.. MOD

    We all are even after all these years.:)
     
    von Poop likes this.
  10. von Poop

    von Poop Adaministrator Admin

    There's a fair amount of cynicism about re that author among the more serious panzer chaps.
    Not read any so won't comment, but I respect the opinion of some of those cynics.

    As Owen says, we're all just picking away at things.
    My personal recommendation for a good quality accessible Tigger book is the Haynes Manual. Often turns up in The Works for £6-7, and lays out the stall pretty well from assorted good sources without the substantial cost that can go with technical vehicle-specific books.
     
  11. Tavarish_Alexei34

    Tavarish_Alexei34 Panzer_fan

    I guess there is a lot of cynicism about lots of historians. I will remain committed to try and learn all I can about tanks in my lifetime.
     

Share This Page