tiger 1.all around excellent performer,after they worked out the kinks.but i like them all.alot of inovation.
Royal Tiger for me, ever since I saw it at Bovington when I was nipper it scared the crap out of me it loks plain menacing...... How amy do they make before switching to the later turret!
Royal Tiger for me, How amy do they make before switching to the later turret! 50 made with the Porsche turret out of a total production of 480
Tiger I. It was said, no allied tank can even match this tank in his armor and canon. But to bad the mobility kinda suck.
I guess that Heinz Guderian said it all when he sent a T34 back to Germany, "Don't fiddle with the damn thing, just copy it!" The balance between; firepower, protection and mobility, combined with its reliability - something the Panther never achieved. The Panzer Leader saw it, experienced it, and wanted it. Ain't no higher recommendation.
The Panzer Iv had a 75mm gun which was very good for dealing with Shermans, but didn't cut it for T-34/85s. They should have put a bigger gun on it and it would have been a mini-panther. That is what they should have produced in large numbers.
I like the Panzer IV, but as I have said it didn't cut it for larger tanks. So I vote Panther. I like Tiger I very much though and in the end it was a very tough decision. The Panzer 3 I find cute though. Tiger II just over-engineered metal box with big gun.
Trouble there is that later IVs were becoming so heavy that they were burning brakes, stripping tyres, and even straining suspension in ways that could lead to long guns fouling the ground over rough terrain. It'd done well, but had just about reached its conventionally-gunned limit. (And hello!)
von Poop Hello to you sir! I understand your point. If the suspension was improved along with the turret, a bigger gun could have been installed. Not that this would have made it any better in the short term. Fun fact: the suspension on the Maus was so good that it allowed it to move at over 20 kph over even ground.
Nowhere else to go with the IV as a gun tank, mate. Despite work on Hydrostatic drives, schmalturms, recoilless guns etc. etc. they could not reliably squeeze any more out of the old dear. A 75/48 was not exactly a low rent piece of ordnance anyway. To fit more than that in required something more than the IV.
Also the turret ring size, I think. Any bigger gun would need a bigger, heavier turret to allow for the bigger breach and longer recoil. Even if they could have managed a larger turret ring, which I don't think was possible, the added weight would really squash down the already bottomed out suspension.
This became a problem with the Sherman, too, which also reached the practical limits of its development in 1944. It could carry the 76 and 17 pdr OK but in addition to bigger guns crews tried to add so much extra armor in the field (cement, sandbags, track plates, etc) that the suspension was strained and both mobility and maintenance suffered as a result.
They shoved some L70 75mm into the Jagdpanzer IV, but that was not a tank and from the way they look in the photos I have to wonder how practical a solution that was.
Why does the word "favorite" (in the title of this thread) annoy me ? It must be my age............................. Ron