Apologies - Spam Idiot.

Discussion in 'Network Information, Suggestions and Feedback' started by von Poop, Mar 23, 2009.

  1. von Poop

    von Poop Adaministrator Admin

    Evening chaps,
    Thanks to a heads up from 52nd Airborne.
    New 'member' - Warhog - has left daft messages about 'ruling the world' on peoples profile messages.

    Banned now (obviously).

    Appeared to have been working his way through the member list alphabetically, sorry to anyone that got this dreary spam, and I'll be going through and deleting the tiresome messages.

    I'm more sorry that idiots seem to feel the need to promulgate & promote whatever rubbish they carry out on the interweb in this way though. :mad:

    Cheers,
    Adam.
     
  2. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Old Hickory Recon

    He sounds like a truly charming former member.
     
  3. Smudger Jnr

    Smudger Jnr Our Man in Berlin

    Adam,

    Thanks for the prompt response. Former member being the operative word.

    Regards
    Tom
     
  4. Drew5233

    Drew5233 #FuturePilot 1940 Obsessive

    Now I know why there are 12 members with names that start with Z :lol:
     
  5. Passchendaele_Baby

    Passchendaele_Baby Grandads Little Girl

    :sign_alright: hm. seems a bit pointless to me, no-one pays any attention to spam anyway... :sign_spam:
    He'll probibly do it to a thousand other sites too... ;)
     
  6. Ron Goldstein

    Ron Goldstein WW2 Veteran WW2 Veteran

    Adam

    Many thanks for your efforts in protecting your flock from the ravages of the Spam nutters.

    In some thirty odd years of meeting up with the type of person who gets his kicks from scattering rubbish on all and sundry I have often thought of what should be the most obvious response.

    One such thought is that one should keep handy a full, plain text copy of "War and Peace" and send it to the gentleman concerned after having perhaps quadrupled it to really block up his e-mail box.

    It wouldn't perhaps achieve much but it would make me feel better :)

    Thanks again

    Ron
     
  7. warhawk

    warhawk Member

    What a winner.:icon_rofl::wacko:
     
  8. deadb_tch

    deadb_tch the deadliest b#tch ever

    Oh, I had nothing about that :D
     
  9. marcus69x

    marcus69x I love WW2 meah!!!

    :lol: Ruling the world?

    Who was he? The name rings a bell.

    It doesn't mention anything on my profile page about him visiting it.

    What was he saying like? :lol:
     
  10. von Poop

    von Poop Adaministrator Admin

    Just spam Marcus, with an email that's associated with a dreary marketing site.
    So 'ruling the world' in a rather dull way, rather than stroking white cats, owning a crocodile pit, and sending out minions to be cut down by the forces of law & order.
     
  11. Gerard

    Gerard Seelow/Prora

    Well done Mr. Poop!! Its hard to logically equate the reasoning behind such actions.
     
  12. marcus69x

    marcus69x I love WW2 meah!!!

    ha ha, sounds like a right character.
     
  13. Owen

    Owen -- --- -.. MOD

    Well done Mr. Poop!! Its hard to logically equate the reasoning behind such actions.


    It's not logical, Captain.


    [​IMG]
     
  14. Ferahgo

    Ferahgo Senior Member

    turnip
     
  15. Recce_Mitch

    Recce_Mitch Very Senior Member

    D...head

    Cheers
    Paul
     
  16. Steve G

    Steve G Senior Member

    He's obviously just an abject failure at Tom Clancy's Play Station games then! :lol:

    Trust me to miss all the fun.
     
  17. Gage

    Gage The Battle of Barking Creek

    What a tool. Bless him, ahhh. :D
     
  18. Smudger Jnr

    Smudger Jnr Our Man in Berlin

    Not good enough to be a tool, at least a tool is useful! :D

    Regards
    Tom
     
  19. Gage

    Gage The Battle of Barking Creek

    Not good enough to be a tool, at least a tool is useful! :D

    Regards
    Tom

    The advert at the top is a tool to help get rid of a tool....................:lol:
     

    Attached Files:

  20. von Poop

    von Poop Adaministrator Admin

    On the more usual kind of spam, Otto once suggested to me that emails across the web should be chargeable per recipient.
    Something like 0.1 or 0.01p a message, that way even heavy legit users might get a yearly bill of just a few quid, but anyone wanting to annoy millions with their 'valuable shares' in dead Nigerian oil barons might think rather harder when considering the cost of their daily plague-mails.

    I kind of like the idea. Could kerb spammers a bit and help restrict the flow of the even more pointless PC infections that these buggers help spread.
     

Share This Page