10 Commandments of german soldier

Discussion in 'General' started by deadb_tch, Mar 11, 2008.

  1. deadb_tch

    deadb_tch the deadliest b#tch ever

    Few days ago I've finished 'Luftwaffe Fighter Ace' by Norbert Hunnig book, it is small and written very interesting, authors have very good style :) Of course its translation to russian. In book author mention 'ten commandments of german soldier' that was printed on back of every Luftwaffe Pilot Personal book, I've read 'em in back of book and find them reasonable and smart, but just after reading them I've got question, why german soldiers mostly were not used this commandments, why this were printed - just to be printed or for some other reasons, is that another sign of nazi regime falsity?..

    U can read it here: German Soldier's Ten Commandments or here in PDF: http://www.historybuff.org/JN-10_Commandments.pdf
     
  2. 4th wilts

    4th wilts Discharged

    bloody hypocritical bo##ocks.4th wilts.
     
  3. marcus69x

    marcus69x I love WW2 meah!!!

    Well some of them clearly hadn't been reading their ten commandments. What are dum-dum bullets?
     
  4. deadb_tch

    deadb_tch the deadliest b#tch ever

  5. marcus69x

    marcus69x I love WW2 meah!!!

    Cheers deadb tch.
     
  6. Gerard

    Gerard Seelow/Prora

    Yeah I think some of them saw that list more as guidelines than actual "Commandments".
     
  7. deadb_tch

    deadb_tch the deadliest b#tch ever

    Yeah I think some of them saw that list more as guidelines than actual "Commandments".
    Anyway, do u find 'em reasonable and do agree with 'em? Personally I agree with 'em and think they r very well formed and describing all aspects of warfare. Good commandments for bad tasks.:unsure:

    EDIT: Adam, thnx for deleting my duplicate post, I shouldn't press 'post' twice :D
     
  8. von Poop

    von Poop Adaministrator Admin

    There've always been military 'dos and donts'.
    I'm sure a bit of googling would turn up very similar lists for various armies across wide periods that are nearly identical.
    That US Field Artillery Journal definitely had some trade/situation/theatre specific lists.
     
  9. Gerard

    Gerard Seelow/Prora

    Anyway, do u find 'em reasonable and do agree with 'em? Personally I agree with 'em and think they r very well formed and describing all aspects of warfare. Good commandments for bad tasks.:unsure:

    EDIT: Adam, thnx for deleting my duplicate post, I shouldn't press 'post' twice :D
    I see your point now Dead and yes I do agree with you that it is a good list! :D
     
  10. deadb_tch

    deadb_tch the deadliest b#tch ever

    I see your point now Dead and yes I do agree with you that it is a good list! :D

    At least someone understood my English in this thread :lol:
     
  11. Gibbo

    Gibbo Senior Member

    These seem to be a very good summary of the rules of war. Pity the country that produced it ignored them.
     
  12. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Hot air manufacturer

    That's all very kind on the Army's part, but then there is Hitler's Directive 33 (supplement, 23 Jul 41):
    6. The troops available for securing the conquered Eastern territories will, in view of the size of this area, be sufficient for their duties only if the occupying power meets resistance, not by legal punishment of the guilty, but by striking such terror into the population that it loses all will to resist.

    The Commanders concerned are to be held responsible, together with the troops at their disposal, for quiet conditions in their areas. They will contrive to maintain order, not by requesting reinforcements, but by employing suitably draconian methods.

    Or Directive 46 (18 Aug 42)
    4. A necessary condition for the destruction of bandit gangs is the assurance to the local population of the minimum requirements of life.
     
  13. Harry Ree

    Harry Ree Very Senior Member

    There was always the Hitler Directives which motivated those serving on the Eastern Front that they would never be held responsible for excesses against the Slavs.This assurance to all German forces gave a free hand for the systematic extermination of civilians and POWs alike.The first directive approved and issued by Hitler on 25 May 1940 referred to the need for systematic extermination in the occupied East in order to Germanise Russia up to the Ural mountains

    There has been a suggestion that since Russia had not signed the 1929 Geneva Convention,their military forces and civilians did not qualify for the protection of the Convention.However the Russians had signed the Hague Convention which had largely been absorbed by the 1929 Geneva Convention.(As an aside, it is interesting that the Germans declared that they had always honoured the Hague Convention in relation to the treatment of POWs and this was circulated to those POWs in StalagLuft 3 prior to the breakout in the spring of 1944.)

    Evidence of the infringement of Conventions covering the rules of warfare and the treatment of civilians and POWs were unearthed by the Russians and no doubt this evidence came from German POWs as they were interrogated in captivity.

    The testimony made by such a Wehrmacht serviceman was made by one Helmut Holwitzer.He relates, "Prior to the start of the campaign against Russia,we had a sheet with 10 fundamental rules for the German soldier pasted within every service record book.It had a list of regulations of the International convention limiting war crimes -protection of lives of disarmed and captive enemy soldiers,protection of lives of civilian population,a ban on looting and rape.When the war started,however, these sheets were reoved from our service books, which made it clear for everyone that bararian ways had gained the upper hand with the consent of the military commands".

    The infringement of the 1929 Geneva Convention was one of the corner stones of the charges against those at at Nuremberg and those involved in battlefield atrocities.
     

Share This Page